Free Waste Audit

City of Karratha


Waste Shredding


EDGE Slayer XL


Western Australia


The City of Karratha in collaboration with FOCUS enviro have successfully completed an in-depth waste shredding trial. Set over a three week period at the city’s 7 Mile Landfill Facility, the trial focused on the volume reduction percentages and the increase in storage density achievable by shredding various waste material along with the direct operational benefits of deploying a primary shredder.

Those include labour, running and maintenance costs of supporting machinery. The City of Karratha provides residential and commercial waste disposal services at the 7 Mile Waste Facility. The facility is located approximately 10km west-southwest of Karratha and owned and operated by the City. With a small population of just 16,000 and many heavy industries close by; the landfill at 7 Mile Waste Facility receives a unique waste stream.

Unlike many other landfills, 50% of Karratha’s waste receivables is bulky commercial and industrial waste with an above average bulk density of 215kg/m³. The average landfill waste stream is predominantly made up of domestic household waste due to the large population cluster that tends to serve the landfill. These landfills have an average commercial waste density reported to be of a much lower density of just 161-185kg/m³.

The unique waste profile received by 7 Mile waste facility has led to a number of challenges including a reduction on the landfill lifespan as originally projected as well as an unacceptable cost for running and maintaining the city’s fleet of landfill compactors. Original lifespan projections were based on a much higher material density that what is actually being achieved. Original projections did not take into account the bulky, abrasive characteristics of the waste actually received by the facility.

With the lack of relevant data from other sources, the City took the step to undertake an intensive study in collaboration with FOCUS enviro with the aim of building a better profile of their waste stream and to gain a greater knowledge of the potential costs and benefits associated by introducing a waste shredding line into the treatment process.

Project Highlights

Key outcomes and benefits of the project

In depth analyis of waste material bulk density and volume received in

waste analyis investingating the bulk density and volume reduction of different material types pre and post shredding

collection of data relevant to the exact waste profile received by 7 mile landfill facility

edge slayer recovered 5-8 t/day of ferrous metal ($18,000 / month)

proven redcuction on the reliance and over use of city’s fleet of compactors

reduce running and maintenance cost of supporting processing equipment

average reduction of material volume post to pre-shredding equalled 61%

shredding of material proved to be a vital step to increasing lifespan of landfill

7 mile waste facility projected lifespan to extend from 2038 to 2054 if shredding wast incorporated in treatment process

projected saving of $7.8 million


An exclusion zone was set up to isolate the shredding trial from the daily operations at the tip thus providing a controlled environment for accurate data collection and prevent possible cross contamination.

An EDGE Slayer XL slow speed shredder was feed with various waste types that had historically proven to be troublesome for the landfills compactors. These were identified as being C&I waste, tyres, HDPE, air filters, mattresses and metal. Over a three-week period the Slayer XL processed these troublesome waste types individually until each stockpile was completed.

To measure the volume reduction and work out the increase in the bulk density of each of the materials processed; the stockpiles were surveyed before and after the shredding process. The data was then extrapolated to give bulk density readings based on the tonnage measured and the original volume or materials stockpile. This process was repeated once the material was shredded to provide comparable data.


The results in all cases as expected showed a reduction in volume and large density increases. However it was the extent of the volume reduction that was of most significance. The overall total volume of all materials processed was reduced from 856m³ (Pre-shred) to 333m³ (Post-shred) prior to compaction.

The overall average percentage reduction of materials by 61% would highlight and recommend the use of slow speed shredding in this application where saving landfill space for the future, maximising cell capacity and reducing the reliance on landfill compactor operation/costs are the goals. In the caseof 7 Mile Waste Facility it is projected that the lifespan of the landfill would be extending from 2038-2054 (16 years) which itself, is a capital saving of approximately $7.8 million. The largest net earner from the process was the recovery of hidden ferrous metal from the general waste stream that traditionally have been lost.

The EDGE Slayer XL was able to recover between 5-8T/day. The equivalent of $18,000 per month. Another notable post shredding benefit included the ease of handling and future compaction, reduction in litter and reduction in rodent/bird interaction of the shredded material with a reduction in material cover required.

Morné Hattingh, Managing City Services – City of Karratha; “Choosing to upgrade an existing plant or designing a new facility to include shredding must be evaluated on a case by case basis to determine if the benefits are worth the additional capital investment and operating costs. Purchasing cost and Operational cost of a waste shredder may seem like a large increase but it should be kept in mind that by far the majority of the cost of operating a landfill facility is dedicated to paying back initial capital investment, which in our case, increase by less than 2% with the addition of shredding equipment.”

The next step in this process is to look at the what has not been measured and which will become the biggest peripheral benefit in the process of shredding at landfill is the savings realised from the reduced reliance on the landfill compactors.

Waste Shredding Performance Trials

Weight (T) Volume (m³) Density (kg/m³)
Waste Material Processed Pre-Shred Post Shred % Reduction Pre-Shred Post Shred % Increase
C&D Waste 115.52 524 189 63.93 220.46 611.21 277.24
Tyres 19.78 122 42 65.57 162.13 470.95 290.48
HDPE 11.29 87 46 47.13 129.77 245.43 189.13
Air Filters 3.14 38 11 71.05 82.63 285.45 345.46
Mattresses 1.24 24 4 83.33 51.66 310 600.08
Metal 26.42 61 41 32.79 433.11 644.39 148.78

Similar Projects

Read how Focus enviro have provided and installed successful recycling solutions
  • BetterGrow
    BetterGrow | Compost | NSW

    New South Wales based organics recycler, BetterGrow own and operate processing facilities across Australia. The company was first established in 1978 and over the course of the past 30 years and have been at the...

  • Rocky Point Mulch
    Rocky Point Mulch | Compost | Queensland

    TWO months ago, sugar cane farmer Josh Keith, who also runs Green Fingers Potting Mix and Rocky Point Mulch in Queensland, decided to take control of his growing stockpile of legacy green waste. The decision...

  • RePurpose It
    C&D Waste
    RePurpose It | C&D Waste | Melbourne

    A constant stream of construction and demolition (C&D) waste material arrives at the Repurpose It Epping recycling hub near Melbourne – over 100 deliveries a day. By installing an EDGE recycling system supplied by FOCUS...