City of Karratha
Waste Shredding
EDGE Slayer XL
Western Australia
Introducing
The City of Karratha in collaboration with FOCUS enviro have successfully completed an in-depth waste shredding trial. Set over a three week period at the city’s 7 Mile Landfill Facility, the trial focused on the volume reduction percentages and the increase in storage density achievable by shredding various waste material along with the direct operational benefits of deploying a primary shredder.
Those include labour, running and maintenance costs of supporting machinery. The City of Karratha provides residential and commercial waste disposal services at the 7 Mile Waste Facility. The facility is located approximately 10km west-southwest of Karratha and owned and operated by the City. With a small population of just 16,000 and many heavy industries close by; the landfill at 7 Mile Waste Facility receives a unique waste stream.
Unlike many other landfills, 50% of Karratha’s waste receivables is bulky commercial and industrial waste with an above average bulk density of 215kg/m³. The average landfill waste stream is predominantly made up of domestic household waste due to the large population cluster that tends to serve the landfill. These landfills have an average commercial waste density reported to be of a much lower density of just 161-185kg/m³.
The unique waste profile received by 7 Mile waste facility has led to a number of challenges including a reduction on the landfill lifespan as originally projected as well as an unacceptable cost for running and maintaining the city’s fleet of landfill compactors. Original lifespan projections were based on a much higher material density that what is actually being achieved. Original projections did not take into account the bulky, abrasive characteristics of the waste actually received by the facility.
With the lack of relevant data from other sources, the City took the step to undertake an intensive study in collaboration with FOCUS enviro with the aim of building a better profile of their waste stream and to gain a greater knowledge of the potential costs and benefits associated by introducing a waste shredding line into the treatment process.
Project Highlights
Key outcomes and benefits of the project
In depth analyis of waste material bulk density and volume received in
waste analyis investingating the bulk density and volume reduction of different material types pre and post shredding
collection of data relevant to the exact waste profile received by 7 mile landfill facility
edge slayer recovered 5-8 t/day of ferrous metal ($18,000 / month)
proven redcuction on the reliance and over use of city’s fleet of compactors
reduce running and maintenance cost of supporting processing equipment
average reduction of material volume post to pre-shredding equalled 61%
shredding of material proved to be a vital step to increasing lifespan of landfill
7 mile waste facility projected lifespan to extend from 2038 to 2054 if shredding wast incorporated in treatment process
projected saving of $7.8 million
TRIAL METHODOLOGY
An exclusion zone was set up to isolate the shredding trial from the daily operations at the tip thus providing a controlled environment for accurate data collection and prevent possible cross contamination.
An EDGE Slayer XL slow speed shredder was feed with various waste types that had historically proven to be troublesome for the landfills compactors. These were identified as being C&I waste, tyres, HDPE, air filters, mattresses and metal. Over a three-week period the Slayer XL processed these troublesome waste types individually until each stockpile was completed.
To measure the volume reduction and work out the increase in the bulk density of each of the materials processed; the stockpiles were surveyed before and after the shredding process. The data was then extrapolated to give bulk density readings based on the tonnage measured and the original volume or materials stockpile. This process was repeated once the material was shredded to provide comparable data.
RESULTS
The results in all cases as expected showed a reduction in volume and large density increases. However it was the extent of the volume reduction that was of most significance. The overall total volume of all materials processed was reduced from 856m³ (Pre-shred) to 333m³ (Post-shred) prior to compaction.
The overall average percentage reduction of materials by 61% would highlight and recommend the use of slow speed shredding in this application where saving landfill space for the future, maximising cell capacity and reducing the reliance on landfill compactor operation/costs are the goals. In the caseof 7 Mile Waste Facility it is projected that the lifespan of the landfill would be extending from 2038-2054 (16 years) which itself, is a capital saving of approximately $7.8 million. The largest net earner from the process was the recovery of hidden ferrous metal from the general waste stream that traditionally have been lost.
The EDGE Slayer XL was able to recover between 5-8T/day. The equivalent of $18,000 per month. Another notable post shredding benefit included the ease of handling and future compaction, reduction in litter and reduction in rodent/bird interaction of the shredded material with a reduction in material cover required.
Morné Hattingh, Managing City Services – City of Karratha; “Choosing to upgrade an existing plant or designing a new facility to include shredding must be evaluated on a case by case basis to determine if the benefits are worth the additional capital investment and operating costs. Purchasing cost and Operational cost of a waste shredder may seem like a large increase but it should be kept in mind that by far the majority of the cost of operating a landfill facility is dedicated to paying back initial capital investment, which in our case, increase by less than 2% with the addition of shredding equipment.”
The next step in this process is to look at the what has not been measured and which will become the biggest peripheral benefit in the process of shredding at landfill is the savings realised from the reduced reliance on the landfill compactors.
Waste Shredding Performance Trials
Weight (T) | Volume (m³) | Density (kg/m³) | |||||
Waste Material | Processed | Pre-Shred | Post Shred | % Reduction | Pre-Shred | Post Shred | % Increase |
C&D Waste | 115.52 | 524 | 189 | 63.93 | 220.46 | 611.21 | 277.24 |
Tyres | 19.78 | 122 | 42 | 65.57 | 162.13 | 470.95 | 290.48 |
HDPE | 11.29 | 87 | 46 | 47.13 | 129.77 | 245.43 | 189.13 |
Air Filters | 3.14 | 38 | 11 | 71.05 | 82.63 | 285.45 | 345.46 |
Mattresses | 1.24 | 24 | 4 | 83.33 | 51.66 | 310 | 600.08 |
Metal | 26.42 | 61 | 41 | 32.79 | 433.11 | 644.39 | 148.78 |
Similar Projects
-
Suez
Green WasteSuez | Green Waste | New South Wales
Focus Enviro is supporting the machinery requirements of Suez’s green waste processing site at Eastern Creek, in New South Wales with the supply of an EDGE TRT622 Track Trommel and FTS Mulch Master. Site Supervisor...
-
Australian Native Landscapes
OrganicsAustralian Native Landscapes | Compost | NSW
Australian Native Landscapes (ANL), a pioneering force in the green waste composting industry, has taken a significant step forward in their operations. Partnering with EDGE Innovate official distribution partner, FOCUS Enviro, ANL has recently acquired...
-
GIPPSLAND SOIL SOLUTIONS
Engineered Top SoilGIPPSLAND SOIL SOLUTIONS | TOPSOIL | VICTORIA
Investment in a new EDGE FTS Radial has allowed Gippsland Soil Solutions to vastly improve their production capacity at their Morwell processing facility. Gippsland Soils Solutions have a history of investing in their machinery fleet. By doing so...